Garden Street leak: Action Group condemns flawed financial deal and how officers ignored public rejection of scheme

Monday, 12 January 2009

Responding to the secret October 2005 report to the Calderdale Council's Cabinet - that authorised the Garden Street development project to proceed – which has now been leaked to the press, Anthony Rae for the Garden Street Action Group has told the Hebden Bridge Web:

“This report reveals how the Calderdale Council officers managed to set aside the overwhelmingly negative response of the public consultation about the Garden Street scheme in February-March 2005; and also what a really bad and risky financial deal they were prepared to recommend to councillors. No wonder they have kept this all secret!

“They were prepared to sell the site, valued at approaching £1/2 million on the open market, for just £1 upfront, in the hope or expectation that right at the end of the development process that they might just pick up a substantial capital receipt for the Council as part of a profit share. But looking at the details of this arrangement, it seems quite possible that the Council might never have received a penny. They also identified the scheme as 'high risk'. If councillors on the Planning Committee had not had the good sense to reject planning permission in September then, in the current market conditions, the development if it had started would have gone bankrupt, the Council would have lost control of its own site – also the major car park for the town - maybe for an indefinite period and no financial return, and the centre of Hebden Bridge and its hard pressed shops and businesses would have been blighted for years. It's all incredibly irresponsible!

“We believe the officers also did not provide councillors with a balanced assessment of the outcome of the public consultation. Although proposed schemes from three possible developers were all rejected, by very large majorities on all 5 assessment criteria, and even though an appendix to the report contains more than 20 pages of strongly expressed criticism about the inappropriateness and scale of the development, the officers nonetheless continued to recommend to councillors that the scheme should proceed. Instead they passed the buck of continued public consultation over to the chosen developers, who then failed to meet this responsibility whilst Calderdale officers looked the other way.

“This shows a real lack of competence on the part of the Council, and justifies the scepticism about this development that the overwhelming majority of people in Hebden Bridge, the Hebden Royd Town Council, and finally Calderdale Council's own Planning Committee properly demonstrated.

"Calderdale now have a real responsibility to make sure that the defence they put up at the forthcoming public inquiry of their decision to reject planning permission is the very best possible, in order to make up for their previous mistakes and to get the town out of the mess they've put it in.”

See Hebweb News
Garden Street sold for a pound


We try to make sure that the Hebden Bridge Web news is correct, but if you are aware of any errors or omissions, please email us

If you have comments on Hebweb news please make a contribution to our discussion forum

More news

© Hebden Bridge Web

Hebweb News
Garden Street sold for a pound

Hebweb News
Calderdale Planning Committee must reject Council officers 'approval' recommendation, says Action Group

Hebweb News
Public meeting at Riverside School

Hebweb Garden
Street Feature

No to Garden Street

Developer's Garden Street site

Hebweb News
The Parking Wizard
August 2008

Hebweb News
Garden Street revised plans
July 2008

Hebweb Forum thread
- from July 2008

Hebweb News
10 Questions for the Calderdale Chief Executive

Hebweb News
Garden Street public meeting, January 2008

Hebweb Forum thread
- from January 2008

Hebweb Forum thread (2007) (50-60 messages)

Hebweb News (June 2007) - Parking options: Garden Street or the Station

Planning Watch

Studio Baad
Hebweb coverage

Search Hebweb

facebook group

Garden Street
Action Group